MUSLIM DEMOCRATS AND
REPUBLICANS
HAVE SOME IGNORANT IDAHO
DETRACTORS
See also Tolerance for Islam in the Early American Republic
PDF
King of Morocco Takes His Country in a New Direction
JPEG
PDF
Religious
Liberalism and the Founding Fathers
The
Imam of Ait Kassem Serves Lunch
PDF
Celebrating Our Muslim
Neighbors by Acknowledging Their Cultural Heritage
PDF
Idaho Congressman Bill Sali is making a fool of himself once again. First, it
was his bill to outlaw the law of gravity as his way to show that minimum wage
laws violate the law of supply and demand. Now, he is claiming that the election
of Keith Ellison, a Muslim representative from Minnesota, and a Hindu prayer in
the Senate are contrary to the Christian principles on which our country was
founded.
Sali must have missed the civics lesson in which the concept of representative
democracy was traced back to ancient Greece and Rome, and not the New Testament
which advises Christians to suffer the oppression of bad government.
Here are just two passages: Titus 3:1:
"Be subject to principalities and powers, to
obey magistrates"; and 1 Peter
2:13,14: "Submit
yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the
king, as supreme: or unto governors."
American Loyalists claimed solid support from Scripture in
refusing to engage in a political revolution which they thought would end in
anarchy.
Sali perhaps is not aware
of the fact that the Greek and Roman texts that contain republican political
philosophy were preserved in the great libraries and universities in medieval
Cairo, Baghdad, and Damascas. Until Renaissance Italians retrieved the original
Greek texts from Constantinople in the 1450s, they arrived in 12th
Century Europe via Islamic Spain as translations from Greek to Syriac to Arabic
and then to Latin.
Sali also does not appear to know about the Treaty of Tripoli,
whose 11th Article begins: "As the United States is in no way founded
on the Christian religion. . . ." This treaty was sent to the Senate by
President George Washington, where it was ratified with no recorded debate, and
then signed by incoming President John Adams.
In
a debate on religious freedom in Virginia, a delegate moved to insert "Jesus
Christ" as "the holy author of our religion." Thomas Jefferson reported that
the motion lost by a "great majority, in proof that they mean to [include] . . .
the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of
every denomination." Did the good Virginians actually imply that the world
religions have the same God?
With regard to prayer in Congress, James Madison objected to state-supported
chaplains in Congress and to the exemption of churches from taxation. Jefferson
thought that prayer in the schools should be strictly voluntary and there should
be a separate room for that purpose. Our founding thinkers were religious
liberals par excellence.
Bryan Fischer, head of Idaho Values Alliance, has agreed with Sali on both Keith
Ellison’s election and the Hindu prayer, and added that Islamic nations have "no
freedom of religion, no freedom of speech, . . . no fundamental rights for
women, and no freedom for ordinary citizens to choose their leaders."
Perhaps Fischer has not been following the news of the July 22 election in
Turkey, where a mildly Islamist Justice and Development Party (AK) won 47
percent of the vote in an election that drew 85 percent of eligible voters. The
AK vote was an increase of 13 percent over the 2002 election.
The number of Turkish women in the 550-seat Parliament doubled to
50, not too far from the 74 women who currently serve in our 535-member
Congress. Women have been elected as prime ministers or presidents of Turkey,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Indonesia, all Muslim countries. Bangladesh has had
two female prime ministers.
Harvard-educated Benazir Bhutto, twice prime minister of Pakistan
and now living in exile in Dubai, was the first Asian woman to be elected
president of the prestigious Oxford Union. In 1988, at the age of 35, she led
her Pakistan Peoples Party to victory and became the female prime minister of
any Muslim country. Even though she is still under the pall of corruption
charges, she is currently the most popular politician in Pakistan. The U. S.
government is now attempting to broker a deal between General Musharraf, who
would remain president, and Bhutto, who would be allowed to return for the Fall,
2007 elections.
Returning now to Turkey, AK Prime Minister Tayyip Erodgan has led
the most successful Turkish government in 50 years. During his five years in
office, the economy has grown 7.3 percent and there has been lower inflation and
record foreign investment. The Turkish lira has gained 19 cents on the dollar
over the past year, compared to the Euro’s rise of 6 cents. Erodgan has reduced
corruption and expanded human rights, although the minority Kurds still complain
about injustices.
The real threat to democracy in most Muslim countries is not
radical Islamists; rather, it is the military, which has ruled occasionally
Pakistan and Indonesia, and has intervened frequently in Turkey. In 1999 Erdogan
was arrested by military police and served a four-month prison term for reading
a Muslim poem in public. Over the years Turkish generals have said that their
interference was necessary to preserve the secular ideals of Kemal Araturk, who
founded the Republic of Turkey in 1923, following Greco-Roman ideas not
religious ones.
Araturk’s party, the Republican People’s Party has prohibited
Turkish women from wearing Muslim head scarves in public and refused to
participate in a recent parliamentary vote on Erdogan’s candidate for president.
The candidate’s wife insisted on wearing the scarf and the Republicans feared
that Erdogan would move the country in the direction of theocratic Iran.
In 1992 an Islamic party won national elections in Algeria.
Military intervention plunged the country into a civil war that led to 150,000
deaths. Saddam Hussein, a secularist and socialist condemned as an infidel by
Osama bin Laden, used his military and police to suppress the majority Shiias,
and the now we are experiencing the disastrous results of not allowing religious
factions to experience the moderation that full political participation affords
them.
In 1953, acting to
protect oil interests in the Middle East, American and British intelligence
agents engineered the overthrow of duly elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad
Mossadeq. The U.S. supported Mohammad Reza Shah who used SAVAK, his ruthless
secret police, to suppress political and religious dissent, making way for the
anti-American Islamic Revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979.
For
almost three decades, the U. S. supported the military government of General
Suharto in Indonesia. In 1975, using information gathered by the CIA, Suharto’s
forces killed upwards of one million Indonesians suspected of being Communists.
Today, Indonesia, the largest Mulsim country in the world with 200,000 people,
is ruled by a democratic government based on Greco-Roman principles, not Islamic
ones. As early as 1974, the Suharto government replaced Islamic marriage
customs with a secular marriage act protecting basic women’s rights. The current
government has established a National Commission on Violence Against Women and
the set up a Ministry for the Empowerment of Women.
In May of 2003, three Saudis were given ten-year sentences for
starting an Al Qaeda cell in Morocco and planning to blow up ships in the
Straits of Gibraltar. The Ministry of Islamic Affairs has also proscribed the
teaching of the fundamentalist Wahabi theology from Saudi Arabia.
A good sign that Moroccans reject the jihadist cause
is found in a recent University of Maryland poll. To the general question of
whether it is ever justified to kill civilians, 79 percent of Moroccans answered
"never." What is interesting, and not a little shocking, is that in the same
poll only 46 percent of Americans said "never" to the killing of civilians.
As both the head of government and religion, Mohammed VI has
issued a decree that Moroccan men must limit themselves to two wives, down from
the traditional limit of four. (Actually only two percent of Moroccan men have
more than one wife.) He has also ruled that women have a right to divorce, a
right to sign the marriage contract, and the right to approve of a second wife.
The king has also supported the abolition of the death penalty, which would be a
first for any Muslim country. It has been rated as the
best Muslim democracy by The Economist magazine, although Freedom House
is not ready to lift its "partially free" label until there is complete press
freedom and more tolerance for critics of the king.
For 1,300 years Muslims, Christians, and Jews
lived in relative peace in Spain until Christian armies pushed out the last
Muslims in Grenada. (Osama bin Laden has declared that one reason for his jihad
is to avenge the demise of Muslim Spain.) In 1492 the King and Queen of Spain declared that all Jews
would have to convert, face death, or leave the country.
Morocco stood ready and embraced
thousands of Jewish refugees, and for 500 years the Morocco‘s
Jews prospered until most of them chose to immigrate to Israel.
Even so Mohammed VI does have one Jew as a member of his
cabinet.
Today 30 percent of the Israeli army is staffed by Berber Jews
from Morocco and Algeria. One must remember that when King Faisal was brought to Baghdad
in 1921, he enthusiastically endorsed the idea of a Jewish homeland in
Palestine. A prominent Jew was appointed Iraqi’s finance minister, and Baghdad’s
Jews and Christians were invited to a reception at Faisal’s coronation.
(Remember Tariq Aziz, Saddam Hussein’s Christian foreign minister?) Faisal
kissed a Torah that was presented to him and declared that in his country "there
is no distinction between Muslim, Christian, and Jew."
The crucial turning point in Jewish-Muslim relations was the Suez
Crisis in 1956, when it was discovered that Israel had joined Britain and France
against Egypt, and had thus betrayed the principle of Middle Eastern cultural
unity implied in Faisal’s gracious gestures in 1921.
It’s taken me more than a few words, but I believe that I have
refuted each of the charges that Bryan Fischer has made against Islam. Fischer
warns Congressman Ellison that he had better follow Christian political
principles, but I’m sure that he will rather follow ancient republicans to whom
liberal democratic politicians around the world, many representing 650 million
Muslims, have been firmly committed for decades.
In 2003 two Republicans walked out of the Washington State
Legislature when a Muslim prayer was given. They later apologized for
their discourtesy. Sali says he has personally apologized to Ellison, but
it would nice if he were to make a public apology as well.